Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Clintsman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1962No. 6888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGUIRE, Superior Court Judge.

This suit was commenced by Lloyd Clintsman and T. R. Estes, appellees, against D. H. Jackson, appellant, and the Octave Gold Mining Corporation to recover wages for services rendered as watchmen at certain mining claims. Appellee Clintsman alleged that he had been employed at a salary of $200 per month, had earned $2,000 (ten months work) and had been paid only $193.75 leaving a balance due of $1,806.25. Appellee Estes alleged that he had also been employed at a salary of $200 per month, had earned $1,700 (eight and one-half months work) and had been paid only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Odom v. First National Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jackson v. RobertsonArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Bank of Arizona v. HarringtonArizona Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Herman v. SchafferArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Quine v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. City of Fort Dodge v. Iowa Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. City of Fort Dodge v. Iowa Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API