Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Hartford Cas.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2018No. ED 106337PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Presiding Judge

Introduction

Mary Spencer and thirteen of her classmates (collectively "Appellants") in the Applied Sciences of Practical Nursing Program at Saint Louis College of Health Careers ("SLCHC") sued SLCHC under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (the "MMPA"), Section 407.020,1 alleging unfair and deceptive practices in its representation of the program. SLCHC demanded coverage from its insurer Hartford Casualty Insurance ("Hartford") under its one-year Business Liability policy (the "Policy"). Hartford denied coverage and denied defense to SLCHC. A bench trial ensued and judgment was entered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. McCormack Baron Management Services, Inc. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Prairie Framing, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. E. O. Dorsch Electric Co. v. Plaza Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Smith v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. C&S Properties, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
  2. Jessica Stacy and Brian Stacy v. The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API