Legal Opinion · Dissent

THOR GALLERY AT SOUTH DeKALB, LLC v. MONGER Et Al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 2016No. A16A0400Published

1DissentMcFADDEN, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The trial court had jurisdiction to rule in this action. So I would decide the merits.

As detailed below, I would affirm the trial court’s denial of summary judgment to Thor Gallery on both Thor Gallery’s claims and Monger’s counterclaim. I also would affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Monger on Thor Gallery’s claims. Because a factual issue exists as to whether Monger was entitled to rescind the contract and recover its security deposit, however, I would reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Monger3 on its counterclaim.

1. Trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Walsh v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Dental One Asssociates, Inc. v. JKR Realty Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Daniel Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API