THOR GALLERY AT SOUTH DeKALB, LLC v. MONGER Et Al.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentMcFADDEN, Judge
I respectfully dissent. The trial court had jurisdiction to rule in this action. So I would decide the merits.
As detailed below, I would affirm the trial court’s denial of summary judgment to Thor Gallery on both Thor Gallery’s claims and Monger’s counterclaim. I also would affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Monger on Thor Gallery’s claims. Because a factual issue exists as to whether Monger was entitled to rescind the contract and recover its security deposit, however, I would reverse the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Monger3 on its counterclaim.
1. Trial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Walsh v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Dental One Asssociates, Inc. v. JKR Realty Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Daniel Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.