Legal Opinion
Thomson & McKinnon v. Minyard
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1968No. 68 Civ. 3138PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
Defendant moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1964) for an order transfer-! ring the above-entitled action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, Greenville Division. Defendant is a resident of that district; thus the action “might have been brought” in the proposed transferee district. The only question before this Court, therefore, is whether the standard determinants of transfer have been so clearly demonstrated to favor the District of South Carolina, that plaintiff’s choice of forum should be disturbed. See Gulf Oil…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- A. Olinick & Sons, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Dempster Brothers, Inc., Defendant-Respondent. A. Olinick & Sons v. Honorable Matthew T. Abruzzo, United States District Judge, Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Parsons v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jenkins v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gates Learjet Corp. v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Codex Corporation and Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corporation and International Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Essex Crane Rental Corp. v. Vic Kirsch Construction Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Blanning v. TischDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Raymond E. Danto, Associates, Inc. v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.