Pearce & Williams v. Borg Chewing-Gum Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Willis. City court of Columbus. October term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
Where the purchaser of goods seeks to avoid the contract of purchase on the ground of fraud, he must, upon the discovery of the facts constituting the fraud, upon his first opportunity to do so, announce his purpose to rescind. If he remain silent and retain possession of the goods received under the contract, without complaint, until long after the discovery of the facts, he will be held to have waived the objection and will be bound by the contract as though there had been no fraud. Smith v. Esley Organ Co., 100 Ga. 628, and cases cited. This is especially true where the purchaser endeavors…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. Estey Organ Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Maynard & Cheeves v. RenderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Warner v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Joiner v. Southern Land Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.