State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of the crime of tampering with drug records, ORS 167.212. He appeals from the resulting judgment.
His sole assignment of error relates to the denial by the trial court of his motion for a mistrial based upon certain testimony elicited from a police officer during the state’s case-in-chief.
The charge was that the defendant unlawfully and knowingly uttered a forged prescription for a drug, Ritalin, which it is acknowledged could only be used pursuant to a physician’s prescription. It is not disputed that the prescription delivered to the pharmacy was a forgery.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Plourd v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Martin v. DretschOregon Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. TreitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. MapelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981