Legal Opinion

Weikert v. Blomster

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 1942No. 33,278PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order of the municipal court of St. Paul which denied (1) his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial, and (2) his motion for an order vacating a previous order of the court dated March 4, 1942, reopening garnishment proceedings and requiring defendant to restore and return to the garnishee therein any and all moneys in the possession of the garnishee at the time of the disclosure.

Plaintiff, an attorney at law, was employed by defendant, Oscar Blomster, to prosecute a personal injury action against one Edward Anderson. The employment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moyer v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Huber v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Southworth v. RosendahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Chapman v. FoshaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Casebolt v. Mid-Continent Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1949
  2. In Re the Petition of Crablex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API