Legal Opinion

Ball v. Lowe

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1902No. L.A. No. 952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Lynn Helm, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This case comes up on the judgment-roll, without a bill of exceptions. The action is for a money demand. The complaint alleges that the defendant made and executed a promissory note, in words and figures following,—to wit:—

Pasadena, Cal., February 1, 1896.

"1,000.00. Ten days after date (no grace), for value received, I promise to pay to the order of the First National Bank of Pasadena, one thousand ($1,000.00) dollars, with interest payable monthly at the rate of eight per cent per annum."

And it is further provided in the said note that should the note run overdue it shall bear interest from…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ball v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API