Legal Opinion

In re: Philips Recalled CPAP, Bi-Level PAP, and Mechanical Ventilator Products Litigation

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00514Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, ) BI-LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL ) VENTILATOR PRODUCTS ) Master Docket: Misc. No. 21-1230 LITIGATION ) ) ) MDL No. 3014 This Document Relates to: ) ) Patrick Burke, #25-514, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Pending before the court is a motion for relief from January 22, 2026 order filed in Civ. No. 25-514 (“Burke’s docket,” ECF No. 17), with exhibits and brief in support, filed by counsel on the court’s electronic filing (“ECF”) system on behalf of plaintiff Patrick Burke…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. BLOM Bank SAL v. HonickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  4. Glenford Ragguette v. Premier Wines & SpiritsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Dale Hall v. Community Mental Health Center of Beaver CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API