Legal Opinion
James v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1984No. C8-84-479PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal of a Commissioner of Economic Security decision, after remand from the Minnesota Supreme Court in James v. Commissioner of Economic Security, 339 N.W.2d 891 (Minn.1983), denying unemployment benefits to relator David James because he was not actively seeking work as required by Minn.Stat. § 268.08, subd. 1(3) (1982). Relator contends the Commissioner did not follow the remand instructions set forth in James.
We affirm.
FACTS
Relator David C. James is an experienced welder. He was employed by Porter, Inc. for sixteen years and was laid off because of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- James v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hansen v. C.W. Mears, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Klatte v. Elm Creek Golf Course, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- James v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- McNeilly v. DEPT. OF EMPLOY. & ECON. DEV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010