Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1975No. 757SC195PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion in not allowing him more than six peremptory challenges. The assignment has no merit. G.S. 9-21 (a) allows a defendant to challenge peremptorily without cause six jurors “and no more”. See also State v. Fuller, 114 N.C. 885, 892, 19 S.E. 797 (1894). The assignment is overruled;

By the second assignment of error argued in his brief, defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing into evidence testimony by State’s witnesses as to defendant’s prior criminal convictions and by denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. State v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. State v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. CarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. LevanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. McGirthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. RenfroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API