Legal Opinion

Tressler's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 1910No. Appeal, No. 212Published

Appeal, No. 212, Jan. T., 1909, by J. L. Tressler, from decrees of O. C. Centre Co., making absolute rule on executor to file an inventory and making absolute rule for an inquest in partition in Estate of Daniel J. Tressler. Rule on executor to file inventory. Rule for order of inquest in partition. Before Orvis, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Errors assigned were the decrees making absolute the rules in question.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The appellee, as the widow of Daniel J. Tressler, after having filed her election to take against his will, presented two petitions to the court below. The one was for a citation to the executor to file an inventory and the other was for a citation directed to all parties interested in the real estate of the deceased to show cause why an inquest in partition should not be awarded for the pur*282pose of fixing and setting out petitioner’s dower. On each of these petitions a rule issued to show cause why its prayer should not be granted. An answer was made to each rule, averring that,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Appeal of WistarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Palethorp's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Appeal of ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Allen's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API