Legal Opinion

Burns v. Schotz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1955No. Docket 56, Calendar 46,403PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The trial court granted, in part, plaintiffs’ request for an injunction restraining defendant from using the trade name “Dog Supply House.”' Defendant appeals, contending that the proofs failed to establish that defendant’s trade name was calculated to deceive the public and that plaintiffs were-guilty of laches.

In 1939 plaintiff Irma V. Conway established a pet shop at 14900 Livernois avenue, Detroit, selected the name “The Dog House” and filed assumed name certificate with the Wayne county clerk. In 1945 she formed a partnership with plaintiff Burns, and the partnership certificate for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Good Housekeeping Shop v. SmitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Weisman v. KuschewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Federal Engineering Co. v. GrievesMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clairol, Inc. v. Boston Discount Center of Berkley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Boron Oil Co. v. CallananMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Geomatrix, LLC v. NSF Int'lCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  4. Dwain Love, Individually and Doing Business as 43rd Parallel Publishing Company v. The New York Times Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Ex-Cell-O Corporation v. SageMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API