Legal Opinion
Info-Hold, Inc. v. Applied Media Technologies Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 24, 2015No. 2013-1528PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
This case comes before us on appeal of a final judgment that Applied Media Technologies Corporation (“AMTC”) does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,991,374 (“'374 patent”). Info-Hold, owner of the '374 patent, asserted the patent against AMTC and Muzak LLC in separate suits before the same judge in the Southern District of Ohio. Those suits led to separate appeals, which were argued on the same day before the same panel. We address the issues raised in Info-Hold’s appeal in the Muzak suit in a separate opinion.
We find the district court adopted a construction that improperly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Mastermine Software, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.