Legal Opinion

Ratcliff v. Paul

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1923No. 23,951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This action, in three counts, was brought to recover damages for fraud and breach of covenant in an assignment of certain fractional interests in an oil ánd gas lease.

The plaintiff alleged that Robinson and Nelson, as agents of Paul and Penley, through false representations on which he relied, induced him to purchase an undivided one-sixth interest in an oil and gas lease for $2,500. Pursuant to this contract, thus fraudulently induced, Paul and Penley assigned the oil and gas lease to plaintiff, beneficially as to the one-sixth interest and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peters v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lockwood v. SturdevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  3. Dale v. ShivelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Lawless v. Collier's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  5. Richardson v. DorrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1833

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wood v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Cushenbery v. Waite-Phillips Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Craig v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Guarantee Title & Trust Co. v. Viola State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Daggett v. Four Hundred Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API