Legal Opinion

Martens v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners, owners of property adjoining intervenor Patrick Mullahy’s lot on South Street in the Village of Marcellus, challenge respondents’ issuance of a building permit for the addition of a second story to the nonconforming structure on Mullahy’s property. Article XIII of the Village Zoning Ordinance provides that no "nonconforming structure may be enlarged or altered in any way which increases its nonconformity.” Because the addition of a second story would not enlarge the "footprint” or outline of the structure, respon*975dents…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Moriarty v. Planning Board of Village of SloatsburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Bockis v. KayserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Katz v. Board of Appeals of Kings PointAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sposato v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Brock v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Matter of Guttman v. Covert Town Bd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API