Legal Opinion

Shook v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2002No. S-9530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Thomas Shook appeals the superior court’s decertification of his class action suit brought against Alyeska Pipeline Service Company under the Alaska Wage and Hour Act. Because the superior court did not specify any reasons under Civil Rule 23 for decertifying the class, we remand this case to the superi- or court for reconsideration of the decertifi-cation. If the superior court chooses on remand to decertify or narrow the class, it must explain its reasoning for so doing under the standards set out in Rule 23.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Thomas Shook…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bartold v. Glendale Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Ulmer v. Alaska Restaurant & Beverage Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Nolan v. Sea Airmotive, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. Alaska Trustee, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Fuhs v. GilbertsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API