Legal Opinion

Clements v. National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 22, 1908No. 970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint, from city court of Nashville — Judge Peeples. December 10, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. A sued B, O, and D, as makers of a promissory note, also claiming attorneys’ fees, and alleging the statutory notice therefor. B answered, admitting the execution of the note as principal maker, with C and D as sureties, and his indebtedness for principal and interest, but denied the allegation of notice' of the claim for attorneys’ fees. C and D made no defense. Judgment was rendered by the court against B for principal and interest, and against C and D for principal, interest, and attorneys’ fees. Held, the judgment was erroneous as to the attorneys’ fees against O and D. If in fact they…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Heard National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. PurvisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Medlock v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API