Baird v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Award Interim Costs, Expenses, and Reasonable Attorney Fees.
I. Background
The plaintiffs filed a complaint in 1987 claiming that the City of Indianapolis 1982 General Ordinance governing the election of City-Council members (General Ordinance 128) was unlawful under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 23 and Article II, Section 1 of the Indiana Constitution, and Ind.Code § 36-3-4-3. In 1989, the plaintiffs amended their complaint, adding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Webster Greenthumb Co. v. Fulton County, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- United States of America v. United States Steel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024