Legal Opinion

Broadbridge v. Perez

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 31, 1990No. 89-CA-1305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Greta and Wesley Broad-bridge, appeal the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant, the State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (the “DOTD”). We now reverse.

Plaintiffs were involved in an intersec-tional collision with defendants, John and Catherine Perez, in Chalmette, Louisiana. Plaintiffs filed suit against the Perezes and their insurers, and the DOTD. This appeal concerns only the summary judgment in favor of the DOTD.

Plaintiffs claimed in their petition that a traffic signal light at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Company v. McClureLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Jewell v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Laufer v. Touro InfirmaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Charles v. FaustLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Settoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisiana Ag Credit v. Livestock ProducersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Hunt Petroleum Corp. v. Texaco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Davis v. Fortis Benefits Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API