Miller Investment Co. v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed October 11, 1932:
Rosenberry, C. J.
It is undoubtedly the law of the state of Wisconsin that where \an established highway or street is altered, the alteration works a discontinuance of that part of the former street not included within the boundaries of the new street and this without any express order discontinuing all or a part of the old way. Hark v. Gladwell, 49 Wis. 172, 5 N. W. 323; State v. Reesa, 59 Wis. 106, 17 N. W. 873; State ex rel. Schroeder v. Behnke, 166 Wis. 65, 162 N. W. 443. There are many cases in other jurisdictions to the same effect.
When in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hark v. GladwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- People Ex Rel. Bowen v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- State v. ReesaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- State ex rel. Schroeder v. BehnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miller v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Grunwaldt v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992