Legal Opinion

Miller Investment Co. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 11, 1932:

Rosenberry, C. J.

It is undoubtedly the law of the state of Wisconsin that where \an established highway or street is altered, the alteration works a discontinuance of that part of the former street not included within the boundaries of the new street and this without any express order discontinuing all or a part of the old way. Hark v. Gladwell, 49 Wis. 172, 5 N. W. 323; State v. Reesa, 59 Wis. 106, 17 N. W. 873; State ex rel. Schroeder v. Behnke, 166 Wis. 65, 162 N. W. 443. There are many cases in other jurisdictions to the same effect.

When in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hark v. GladwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. People Ex Rel. Bowen v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. State v. ReesaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. State ex rel. Schroeder v. BehnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grunwaldt v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API