Legal Opinion

In the Interest of L.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 1, 1988No. 88-1047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, Judge.

We reverse the involuntary placement of appellant in the Northeast Florida State Hospital, because the criteria of section 394.467(l)(a)2.a. and 394.467(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), were not met. The mere need for treatment alone is insufficient to commit an individual, Neff v. State, 356 So.2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Even though the other criteria might be met, a non-dangerous individual, capable of surviving safely in freedom by herself with the help of others, should not be involuntarily committed. In Re Beverly, 342 So.2d 481 (Fla.1977). See also Williams v. State, 522…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re BeverlySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Neff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Reigosa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Singletary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API