Legal Opinion
Hills v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 24, 1916No. 21043PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish Of Orleans; George H. Théard, Judge. Action by Mrs. Kate Stewart Hills against the City of New Orleans and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, C. J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action and dismissing her suit, which is an action for damages sustained by reason of the following circumstances, as set forth in her petition, to wit: That the city of New Orleans and certain other defendants, whom she names, are the owners of the premises No. 926 Touro street, in the city of New Orleans:
“That on June 26, 1914, about 6 o’clock, p. m., petitioner was walking on Touro street * * * and was passing in front of the premises 926 Touro street, * * * and, as she was…
2Cited by3 opinions
- James v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- McIlhenny v. Roxana Petroleum Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. RomeroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929