Files v. Hill
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceDarrell Hickman, Justice
I agree that the appellant’s claim must fail for the reasons given by the majority. In an election contest one must be able to demonstrate that the results will be different; in the suit filed by Jack Files, admittedly there are not enough alleged votes for him to make a difference. It could only be that Files’ suit, added with the suit of Arnold, alleging generally other votes for Files, that a valid contest would exist, and the complaint of Arnold must fail for the reasons given by the majority.
However, the majority opinion in my judgment fails to answer certain questions raised in this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cain v. CarlleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Walker v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1975