People v. Daniels
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Appellants were indicted for conspiring falsely to move and maintain an action of slander by Zua Daniels against M. J. Church, under division 3 of section 182 of the Penal Code, and upon the trial were found guilty by the jury, and a judgment against each was entered, imposing a fine; and they appeal from said judgments and an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The appeal from the order denying a new trial must be dismissed, because taken long after the time limited therefor by section 1239 of the Penal Code.
Appellants’ brief, however, is almost wholly devoted to questions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.