Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Paramount Textile Machinery Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 16, 1966No. A.R.D. 202; Entry No. 3094Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION

Nichols, Judge:

I agree with the court’s opinion, but I am concerned with its failure to deal with, or even mention, authorities *767heavily relied on by appellant. In my view, an opinion loses much of its value if it does not afford affirmative evidence that the court has considered, and believes it has followed, should not follow, or can distinguish, pertinent cases cited to it.

The best support appellant has for its contention that the English home market for this merchandise is restricted, is United States v. F. W. Myers & Co., Inc., 24 Cust. Ct. 553, Reap. Dec. 7798. In that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. United States v. F. W. Myers & Co.United States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API