Legal Opinion · Dissent

Simon v. State Compensation Insurance Authority

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 20, 1997No. 95SC304Published

1DissentChief Justice Vollack

The majority holds that the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority (CCIA) is not an arm of the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes and consequently is a “person” that may be sued pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). A review of the three factors used by the majority in making this determination leads me to a different result. Accordingly, I dissent.

I

Section 1983 provides that any “person” who, under color of state law, deprives an individual of his or her constitutional rights may be sued for damages. However, the United States Supreme Court has held that states, largely due to their…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Rodriguez v. SchuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API