Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Board of County Auditors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1934No. Calendar 37,744PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. Plaintiff is a constitutional officer, being one of the circuit judges of the sixth judicial circuit, comprising the county of Oakland. He was elected to that office in April, 1929, for a term of six years, commencing January 1, 1930, and is-now serving. At the time of his election and commencement of service, his salary, fixed by legislative enactment, was $6,000 per annum, payable by the State, and an additional salary of $5,000, payable by the county of Oakland, under resolution of the board of supervisors. The Oakland board of supervisors, at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crawford v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Adsit v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Holland v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. McQuaid v. Oakland County Board of County AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Green v. du PontSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
  5. Haack v. BanishMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API