Henningsmeyer v. First State Bank of Conroe

DISSENTING OPINION.

Mr. Justice HAWKINS

delivered the following dissenting opinion:

Does the record in this case justify the Supreme Court in finding and holding, as a matter of fact, that the action of the Court of Civil Appeals for the Ninth Supreme Judicial District, in setting aside its order overruling the first motion for-a rehearing, "was for the sole purpose of indirectly extending the period of time during which a petition for a writ- of error might validly be filed, such action constituting a, deliberate fraud upon the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court ?

In my opinion it docs…