Pacific Shores Property Owners Ass'n v. Department of Fish & Wildlife
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
In this inverse condemnation action, we face a unique situation where a state agency assumes control of a local flood control process, and it determines to provide less flood protection than historically provided by a local agency in order to protect environmental resources. We affirm the trial court’s judgment finding the state agency liable in inverse condemnation for a physical taking of plaintiffs’ properties, and not liable for a regulatory taking. We reverse the judgment to the extent the court found another state permitting agency liable in inverse…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Harpreet Singh v. Edward BorlaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Madani v. RabinowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Ruiz v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.