Weinstein v. Gindi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The motion court providently exercised its discretion in striking plaintiff Weinstein’s pleading and dismissing his claims based on his willful refusal to appear for deposition in this action (CPLR 3126; Fisk & Richardson, P.C. v Schindler, 75 AD3d 219, 220 [2010]). Weinstein commenced the action in New York County and was ordered to appear for deposition by August 5, *5272009. Depositions of parties to an action are generally held in the county where the action is pending; if a party demonstrates that conducting his deposition in that county would cause undue hardship, the Supreme Court in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fish & Richardson, P.C. v. SchindlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hamilton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Yu Hui Chen v. Chen Li ZhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wygocki v. Milford Plaza HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Burnside v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Matter of Adams v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019