Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Gindi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in striking plaintiff Weinstein’s pleading and dismissing his claims based on his willful refusal to appear for deposition in this action (CPLR 3126; Fisk & Richardson, P.C. v Schindler, 75 AD3d 219, 220 [2010]). Weinstein commenced the action in New York County and was ordered to appear for deposition by August 5, *5272009. Depositions of parties to an action are generally held in the county where the action is pending; if a party demonstrates that conducting his deposition in that county would cause undue hardship, the Supreme Court in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Fish & Richardson, P.C. v. SchindlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Hamilton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Yu Hui Chen v. Chen Li ZhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Wygocki v. Milford Plaza HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Burnside v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Matter of Adams v. AnnucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API