Legal Opinion

Buckhannon v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: In each of these appeals an inmate charged with violating a disciplinary rule requested to be present when his witnesses were interviewed during a Superintendent’s proceeding. The respective Hearing Officers denied each request on the ground that the witnesses’ presence in special confinement units would jeopardize the security of the units or the safety of the witnesses. On these records, those reasons were rationally based (see, Matter of Cortez v Coughlin, 67 NY2d 907, 909; People ex rel. Bradley v Smith, 115 AD2d 225; see also, Matter of Tracey v Coughlin, 122 AD2d 459).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cortez v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People ex rel. Bradley v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Tracey v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holmes v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Lonski ex rel. Adams v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API