Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2000No. 99-2069PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Any defect caused by the alleged failure to file criminal complaints or the claimed impropriety of the municipal court’s assumption of jurisdiction over the rape charges is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Taylor was convicted and sentenced upon an indictment regularly issued, and the common pleas court had jurisdiction to try, convict, and sentence him on the charged offenses. See State ex rel. Dozier v. Mack (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 368, 369, 708 N.E.2d 712, 713; see, also, Simpson v. Maxwell (1964), 1 Ohio St.2d 71, 30 O.O.2d 40, 203 N.E.2d 324;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Orr v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Simpson v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Brown v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Dozier v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. North v. BeightlerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Phillips v. IrwinOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Phillips v. IrwinOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Harris v. BagleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Rackley v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API