Legal Opinion
St. Clair v. Russell & Pugh Lumber Co.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided July 3, 1943No. 1526PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE A. CLARK, District Judge.
The complaint in this case was filed on the 14th of December, 1942, and the cause of action is based on a violation of Section 207, 29 U.S.C.A. of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.
The complaint alleges that the defendant Russell and Pugh Lumber Company was and still is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Idaho, and that they are employers of labor, engaged in the production of goods for commerce in that they are operating a sawmill at Springston, Idaho, at which they are engaged in cutting, manufacturing, securing, holding and delivering…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Fleming v. AH Belo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- North Electric Mfg. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Knoxville Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- A. H. Belo Corp. v. StreetDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walling v. General Industries Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945