First National Bank of Neillsville v. Town of York
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff is a national bank. The defendant town of York is a duly organized^ town. The defendant Joint School District No. 4 of the City of Neillsville (hereafter called the district) is a duly organized school district in which a high school is maintained. Certain pupils residing in the town of York and not within a high school district attended the Neillsville high school. The clerk of that district duly filed with the clerk of the town of York the claim of the district for the amount of the tuition to which it was entitled. Sec. 40.47 (5), Stats. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Appleton v. Outagamie CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. City of Sheboygan v. County Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- First Wisconsin National Bank v. Town of CatawbaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Steuerwald v. RichterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- County of Sheboygan v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lurye v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Chalupnik v. SavallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- First National Bank of Neillsville v. Town of YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Opinion No. Oag 18-85, (1985), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1985