Mitsios v. Morios
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 304, Oct. T., 1920, by plaintiff:, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Oct. T., 1919, No. 56, on verdict for defendant in the case of Earnest Mitsios v. Angelo Morios. Trespass to recover damages for entering plaintiff’s place of business and closing the same without authority. Before Landis, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 304, Oct. T., 1920, by plaintiff:, from judgment of C. P. Lancaster Co., Oct. T., 1919, No. 56, on verdict for defendant in the case of Earnest Mitsios v. Angelo Morios. Trespass to recover damages for entering plaintiff’s place of business and closing the same without authority. Before Landis, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was the charge of the court and refusal to allow certain depositions of plaintiff’s witness to be read.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
The alleged trespass took place July 3, 1919. The plaintiff Mitsios and defendant Morios had been partners about four months before. Thereafter, Mitsios alone conducted a restaurant called the Rainbow in premises leased by him on King Street, Lancaster, and *592described by Mm as a “real up to date place.” About June 30,1919, he departed from Lancaster in search of a cook and left Stephen Manuel in charge of the Rainbow alleging that Manuels “duty was to operate the restaurant and attend to the wants of the customers until the plaintiff returned.” In his statement of claim he…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Jerominski v. Fowler, Dick & WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Hill v. Lee, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1970
- Jerominski v. Fowler, Dick & WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Nelson v. Pennsylvania Railroad, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1956