Legal Opinion

Warren v. Stansbury

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1945No. 31736PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, V.C.J.

The plaintiff, Troy Stansbury, sued the defendant, Delish Warren, in forcible entry and detention in the justice of the peace court to recover possession of the 40 acres of land that was involved in Warren v. Stansbury, 190 Okla. 544, 126 P. 2d 251.

The facts out of which the present controversy arose are as follows: The land was sold and conveyed to the county at a tax resale by deed executed May 20, 1936, and recorded June 11, 1936. On August 3, 1936, the land was conveyed to Troy Stansbury by a county deed. By a quitclaim deed dated August 7, 1937, Stansbury conveyed the land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Bank of Stockham v. Bernhard-WeinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Warren v. StansburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Schrader v. Bd. of Com'rs Roger Mills Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warren v. StansburySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Baker v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API