Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Deckoff, Krishnasastry & Doscher, M.D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated January 11, 1995, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of collateral estoppel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the "party invoking the doctrine of collateral estoppel must show that the critical issues in the instant action [were] necessarily decided in the prior action and that the party against whom estoppel is sought has been afforded a full and fair opportunity to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. New York Site Development Corp. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Weber v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. MoriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API