Legal Opinion

Monusko v. Postle

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1989No. Docket 95314, 95355PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.

These consolidated appeals come to us on denial of the defendants’ motion for summary disposition as to Count i of plaintiffs’ complaint. Count i seeks damages for plaintiff Andrea Monusko for a preconception tort. The issue is one of first impression in this jurisdiction. We affirm the decision of the trial court and conclude that such a cause of action exists on the facts of this case.

Andrea Monusko was born on February 10, 1980, in a severely impaired physical and mental condition, suffering from rubella syndrome. A complaint was filed on her behalf in 1985. The complaint sets forth three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Albala v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Womack v. BuchhornMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Walker v. RinckIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lough Ex Rel. Lough v. Rolla Women's Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Lynch v. ScheiningerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API