Monusko v. Postle
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.
These consolidated appeals come to us on denial of the defendants’ motion for summary disposition as to Count i of plaintiffs’ complaint. Count i seeks damages for plaintiff Andrea Monusko for a preconception tort. The issue is one of first impression in this jurisdiction. We affirm the decision of the trial court and conclude that such a cause of action exists on the facts of this case.
Andrea Monusko was born on February 10, 1980, in a severely impaired physical and mental condition, suffering from rubella syndrome. A complaint was filed on her behalf in 1985. The complaint sets forth three…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Albala v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Womack v. BuchhornMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Walker v. RinckIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Lough Ex Rel. Lough v. Rolla Women's Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Lynch v. ScheiningerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.