Legal Opinion

Anderson, Adm'x. Et Vir v. Armstrong

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1938No. 7092PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts of this case are extremely complicated. We shall endeavor to set out chronologically, and as briefly as possible, the factual background of the suit.

On March 6, 1928, the will of W. K. Marr, deceased, was admitted to probate in the Probate Court of El Paso County, Texas. Such will named Grace Marr, wife of said W. K. Marr, as independent executrix without bond, and Mrs. Marr qualified as such. O. R. Armstrong, an attorney, represented Mrs. Marr in the probating of said will and afterwards represented her as administratrix. Some months later, under advice of the said Armstrong, Mrs.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Griggs v. BrewsterTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gregory v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bobb v. BobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  4. In re DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Thomas, Administrator v. HawpeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lee v. Lee, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rushing v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Portwood v. BuckalewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API