Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, District Judge:
This action is brought under 28 U.S. C.A. § 1336 (1966) to set aside two Reports and Orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Aggregate Rates on Wearing Apparel — Railway Express Agency, 318 I.C.C. 737 (1963) and 326 I.C.C. 92 (1965). In the 1963 case the Commission found the aggregate rate structure used by the Railway Express Agency (REA) was just and reasonable. In the 1965 Opinion the Commission found the same rate structure was compensatory.
Aggregate rates, for the purposes of this ease, are discount rates which apply to shipments of goods from…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Capital Telephone Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boris and Annette F. Squire, D/B/A Air Page, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Humboldt Express, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Robert L. Curtis and Southern Forwarding Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- A. Lindberg & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.