Legal Opinion

Wood v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 6, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

On the trial of this ease in tbe court below a verdict' was rendered for appellee in obedience to a peremptory instruction given by the court at the conclusion of the appellant’s evidence. So the only question arising on this appeal is whether or not the evidence introduced in behalf of the appellant was sufficient to take the case to the jury. The action was • brought by appellant to recover of appellee damages for the burning of his storehouse and goods, situated at Belton, a village in Muhlenberg County; it being alleged in the petition that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Hart's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Louisville Gas Co. v. Kaufman, Straus & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Hughes v. Cincinnati, &c., RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  4. City of Louisville v. BridwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. McDonald's Admx. v. Louisville Car Wheel & Railway Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Owen Motor Freight Lines v. Russell's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Louisville Taxicab Transfer Company v. RenoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Cole v. Empire District Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Woodburn v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API