Legal Opinion

People v. Mazzella

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• Order affirmed. While a denial of coram nobis relief is not res judicata as to a subsequent petition on the same grounds, the question whether to entertain such an application is ordinarily one of discretion (Matter of Bojinoff v. People, 299 N. Y. 145; People v. Martine, 303 N. Y. 789). Even when new or additional evidence, is claimed to have been found, the decision whether or not to hold a hearing on the new application is an exercise of judicial discretion (People v. Sullivan, 4 N Y 2d 472). In the' present instance there was no abuse of this discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Bojinoff v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. People v. MartineNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Nathaniel Williams v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, N. Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. People v. D'AlessandroNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. United States Ex Rel. Jiggetts v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  4. People v. CortezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Reed v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API