Thacker v. Ward
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.
This appeal involves only a question of pleading, not the right of a plaintiff to recover for emotional disturbances precipitated by physical injuries. Upon proper allegations and medical proof as to causation, it is generally held that recovery for such a disturbance may be had. Williamson v. Bennett, 251 N.C. 498, 112 S.E. 2d 48 (recovery denied because no actual physical injuries); Ford v. Blythe Brothers Co., 242 N.C. 347, 87 S.E. 2d 879; see, on the requisites of medical proof of causation, Gillikin v. Burbage, ante, 317, 139 S.E. 2d 753.
Plaintiff’s evidence, viewed in the light most…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gillikin v. BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smith v. CorsatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- McKee, Sheriff v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Higgins v. HermesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Holroyd v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Smith v. BuckhramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Inman v. HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.