Legal Opinion

Thacker v. Ward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1965No. 472PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.

This appeal involves only a question of pleading, not the right of a plaintiff to recover for emotional disturbances precipitated by physical injuries. Upon proper allegations and medical proof as to causation, it is generally held that recovery for such a disturbance may be had. Williamson v. Bennett, 251 N.C. 498, 112 S.E. 2d 48 (recovery denied because no actual physical injuries); Ford v. Blythe Brothers Co., 242 N.C. 347, 87 S.E. 2d 879; see, on the requisites of medical proof of causation, Gillikin v. Burbage, ante, 317, 139 S.E. 2d 753.

Plaintiff’s evidence, viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gillikin v. BurbageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Smith v. CorsatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. McKee, Sheriff v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Higgins v. HermesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Holroyd v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Smith v. BuckhramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Inman v. HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API