Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Duke Capital
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 25, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00229Unknown
1Opinion
U . S . D IC SL TE RR ICK T COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH SARAH CASTILLO, VIKTORIA SVENSSON, and ROBIN BEAN, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, COMPEL ARBITRATION v. Case No. 2:20-cv-00229-JNP-JCB DUKE CAPITAL, LLC, District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendant. Before the court is Defendant Duke Capital, LLC’s (“Duke Capital”) Motion to Compel Arbitration (the “Motion”). ECF No. 17. The court entertained oral argument on the Motion on January 29, 2021. Having reviewed the memoranda, including supplemental authority filed on January 25,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.