Legal Opinion

Strawbridge & Clothier v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 3, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this workmen’s compensation ease, the question is whether, in defense to a petition for disability benefits, an employer must establish alternative theories of causation for an accident, or whether it is sufficient for the employer merely to present evidence rebutting the claimant’s allegation that the injury is work-related. We find that an employer defending against such a petition need not raise and prove alternative theories of causation in order to prevail.

I

The claimant, Robert Campbell, was employed in the Housekeeping Department of the Strawbridge & Clothier department store. In May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Avon Products, Inc. v. LamparskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  3. Food Crafts, Inc. v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Santiago v. Food Crafts, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Falconi v. Coombs & Coombs, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Chubb v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Delaware Veterans Home v. DixonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Elliott v. State of Delaware.Superior Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. Estate of Kirk Anderson v. American Seaboard ExteriorsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API