Legal Opinion
United States v. County of Humboldt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1980No. Nos. 77-1026, 77-1085PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
In this action, the United States, the Hoopa Valley Tribe, and the Hoopa Valley Housing Authority sought to enjoin the County of Humboldt, California, from enforcing its zoning and building codes against four Indian construction projects on *1261Indian Trust Property within the Hoopa Valley Reservation. The State of California intervened in support of the County. The County, by way of counterclaim, sought to enforce the codes, and also its ordinances No. 945 (Sewage) and No. 896 (Roads). Cross motions for preliminary injunctions were consolidated with trial on the merits.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Rosa Band of Indians v. Kings CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Carlos Herrera, Victor Hugo Herrera, and Felipe Santiago Herrera, A/k/a"chiquito"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Helix Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community and Edith Crooks, United States of America, Intervenor Below v. City of Prior Lake, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Sheppard v. SheppardIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Juan Segundo v. City of Rancho Mirage, a Municipal Corporation, Jean Chormicle Kapp v. City of Cathedral City, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Simmons v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- FRIENDS OF EAST WILLITS VALLEY v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.