Legal Opinion

East Taylor Municipal Authority v. Finnigan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1963No. Appeals, 34, 35, 36, and 37PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

These appeals are from judgments entered for appellee-defendants in four scire facias sur municipal claims proceedings. The appellant, East Taylor Municipal Authority, filed liens against appellees’ properties for “water furnished” from January 1, 1960, to June 30, 1961. Although the liens state that they are for water furnished, the actual basis for appellant’s claims is a contract which it entered into with appellees, whereby, in consideration of its construction of a water system to serve, inter alia, appellees’ properties, each agreed (1) to pay a tapping fee of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gericke v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Jolly v. Monaca BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Central Iron & Steel Co. v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Consolidated Ice Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Kohler v. ReitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Falls Township Authority v. Penn Park, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1972
  3. Windber Area Authority v. Bottorff, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API