Legal Opinion
Metcalfe v. Bradshaw
Illinois Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison County; the Hon. A. S. Wilderman, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bailey
This was a bill in chancery, brought by Andrew W.» Metcalfe against William P. Bradshaw, for an accounting. On the 26th day of August, 1874, the complainant and defendant formed a co-partnership for the pratice of the law, and for that purpose executed the following co-partnership articles:
“Articles of Agreement signed and agreed upon between Andrew W. Metcalfe and William P. Bradshaw, this 26th day of August, A. D. 1874:
“1st. Reposing in each other mutual confidence and trust, do hereby associate ourselves together for the purpose of practicing the law, firm to be known by the name of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wheeler v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- McMahon v. McClernanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blomstrom v. DuxIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Bluestein v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Faggelle v. MarennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Roth v. BoiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Crownfield v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.