State v. Jones
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Louisa District Court. in bis argument,, upon the sufficiency of the indictment, cited Hartman y. The Commomoealth, 5 Barr (Pa.), 66; Hawk. P. C. B., 2, eh. 25, § 60; Commomoealth v. Eastman, 1 Cush., 189; 1 L. Cr. C., 5^54, and notes on 294; The Commonwealth y. Hunt, 4 Met., Ill; The People v. Lambert, 9 Cow., 578. upon tbe same point, cited The State y. Buchanan, 5 Harris & John., 829; The State y.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Louisa District Court. in bis argument,, upon the sufficiency of the indictment, cited Hartman y. The Commomoealth, 5 Barr (Pa.), 66; Hawk. P. C. B., 2, eh. 25, § 60; Commomoealth v. Eastman, 1 Cush., 189; 1 L. Cr. C., 5^54, and notes on 294; The Commonwealth y. Hunt, 4 Met., Ill; The People v. Lambert, 9 Cow., 578. upon tbe same point, cited The State y. Buchanan, 5 Harris & John., 829; The State y. Rowley, 12 Conn.; The State v. Burnhame, 15 N. H., 396; Commonwealth v. Mifflin, 5 Watts & S., 461; Commomoealth y. Warren, 6 Mass., 73; Commonwealth y. Davis, 9 Id., 416; The People…
1Opinion of the Court
■ Lowe, J.
On the 22d day of Julyj 1857, Robert Wilson executed and delivered to one N. W. Burris, a promissory note of $5,850, payable twelve months after date. This note was indorsed in blank by Burris to Geo. A. Jones, one of the defendants in this prosecution. After-wards, on the 22d of March, 1859, said Jones instituted a suit on said note, making Wilson, the payer, one Sylvanus Dunham, surety, and Burris, the indorser, parties, alleging in his petition, that Dunham had signed said note as surety after the same had been executed and delivered by Wilson. .At the trial, Dunham’s defense was…
2Cited by13 opinions
- People v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- State v. LoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- State v. EnoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.